Inside Medical Evidence
Medical Evidence
Glucosamine Basic Science Studies
Chondroitin Basic Science Studies
Glucosamine Clinical (Human) Studies
Chondroitin Clinical (Human) Studies
Combined Clinical (Human) Studies
Review Articles on Glucosamine
Review Articles on Chondroitin

Home Page
News
Supplements
Resources
Products
Books
Q & A
About Dr. Theo


Medical Evidence

Glucosamine Sulphate In Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review T.E. Towheed , Rheumatic Diseases Unit, Queen's University, Canada

Background: Glucosamine sulphate (GS) has been proposed as a slow acting drug in osteoarthritis (OA). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of GS in the management of OA were systematically reviewed. A MEDLINE search strategy, supplemented by a review of reference lists, was used to help identify English language RCTs published between 1966 and 1997. Quantitative review of the efficacy of GS in OA was performed by meta-analysis. Effect sizes were used to synthesize quantitative data that were measured with different scales, and Peto Odds Ratios (OR) were used for pooling dichotomous data. The search strategy identified a total of 9 RCTs. The average duration of the RCTs was 5.4 weeks. The mean number of subjects randomized subjects was 97. GS was administered orally in 5 RCTs, parenterally in 2, and a combined oral/parenteral route was used in 2 RCTs. 6 RCTs included subjects with only OA of the knee, 2 did not state the location of the OA, and 1 included subjects with OA at multiple sites. In the 7 RCTs that compared GS versus placebo, GS was always superior. 2 RCTs: compared GS versus ibuprofenGS was superior in 1 and equivalent in 1. There were methodological problems with these RCTs, including a lack of standardization of the case definition of OA, and a lack of standardization of outcome assessment. The combined effect size for pain relief, comparing GS vs placebo (n = 5 studies) was 1.23 (95% CI, .93 to 1.53). The Peto OR, for overall favorable response comparing GS versus placebo (n = 2 studies) was 2.04 (95% CI, 1.38 to 3.02). GS was found to be extremely safe and superior to placebo, and at least similar in efficacy to ibuprofen. Further studies are needed to determine whether the route of administration of GS is clinically important, and whether the therapeutic effect of GS in OA is site specific.

Source: American College of Rheumatology Annual Meeting November 10, 1998; Abstract: 995. Poster Session D: Osteoarthritis: Clinical Trials


 
 

Learn about and purchase the book

90% of people who follow The Arthritis Cure treatment program don't need anti-inflammatories (like Aleve, Celebrex or Advil). Dr. Theo warned people that these drugs, used first... read more

 

  

Copyright ©1997-2005 Jason Theodosakis, M.D.
Privacy Policy
Please read this site's disclaimer.